GET REAL POST
We beg to differ.


There comes a time when one starts getting bored with one’s job and starts to think about going for another one just because it looks like the grass is much greener on the other side. But when the time comes to say goodbye to the old job, realization suddenly hits and then one starts having second thoughts about leaving. That is because in most cases, just when we are about to go, that is also the time when some people we have touched show their appreciation for our contribution to the organization. Indeed, life seems more complicated when one is faced with a lot of options. This must be what Senator Miriam Santiago is feeling right now.

After her emotional outbursts on live television during the impeachment trial of former Chief Justice Renato Corona, Senator Santiago earned quite a number of both critics and admirers. While her admonishing the incompetent and law-breaking prosecutors and their cohorts on a regular basis irked enough onion-skinned members of the public to petition the International Criminal Court (ICC) to reconsider giving her a post in the court as a judge, she also renewed some Filipinos’ hope for the country again.

Senator Santiago had since been mobbed in public by people seeking a chance to be photographed with her and was welcomed with a standing ovation during a recent ballet performance. This is enough indication that there are Filipinos who can look beyond the manner with which she delivers her message across and that there are people who do know that Senator Santiago makes a lot of sense. And for as long as people like her are still around to tell it like it is, public servants who try to get away with mediocrity would think twice about doing it lest they get a tongue lashing and be branded as idiots by the feisty Senator.

Even though Santiago says she is still keen on being a judge in the ICC, nevertheless she says she cannot resign from her Senatorial post just yet. She reiterated recently “that she would not resign from the Senate until she has assumed her post at the ICC in The Hague, Netherlands.” The following are her statements:

“I regret that I am unable to determine the date of my resignation, and that the ICC itself does not know either,” Santiago said in a letter to Comelec Chairman Sixto Brillantes Jr.

“Of course, I will not resign from the Senate, until the ICC calls me to duty. Hence, I respectfully submit that even only out of prudence, the 2013 ballot should list only 12 vacancies for senators,” she added.

The pressure is on for her to tender her resignation since there are so many people who are fighting for the senatorial post she could vacate prior to the 2013 senatorial election. Most of the candidates are silent about their desire for her to go but Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile made no secret about his wish that Santiago give up her post as soon as possible. It is also no secret that Enrile’s son, JPE Jr or Jack as he is known, is vying for one of the twelve senatorial slots. Here’s what he said:

Maybe she should consider… the national interest over her interest as a senator by relinquishing her slot as a senator since she’s already assured of a membership [in the ICC]

It is quite suspect that JPE is very vocal against Santiago’s decision to stay on until she is called in at the ICC. It seems the elderly Enrile wants to ensure that there is enough vacancy to secure his son’s position in the election.

It is not like it is up to the Senate President to fire any of the Senators especially a popular one like Senator Santiago. It’s not like JPE is the boss of the Senators. In fact, the Senators owe their positions of power to the voters, and they are all answerable to the people. As the Senate president, JPE simply presides over the sessions of the Senate among other administrative tasks of the legislative branch. His flaky performance as the presiding officer of the impeachment court confirmed what some people think — that it seems like JPE’s allegiance is only to himself.

It’s really such a shame that JPE has become very blatant about his desire to keep things in the family and pass on the reigns to his first-born son. It is even shameful that the people are allowing this to happen because I am pretty sure Jack Enrile will win in the Senatorial election anyway. The voters won’t even bother to ask if he actually deserves to be a senator. They’ll just vote the younger Enrile because of his father’s popularity the same way they voted for incumbent President BS Aquino because of his own parents’ popularity.

Most rational people don’t think that Jack Enrile has anything new to offer. Besides, his father has been a public servant since the 1960s and yet hasn’t really made much of a difference to the country. All the public got is one lousy puppet leader after another after JPE mounted a coup d’etat against former President Ferdinand Marcos. Let’s not forget that JPE was among the very first batch of rule breakers who inadvertedly led the society into decay. Some people might consider the 1986 Edsa revolution a successful venture into democracy but, truly, it never really yielded much that would go on to change the conditions of the poor in any significant way. It just changed the people in power. And those in power don’t seem interested in the sorts of genuine reforms that would level the playing field.

Senator Santiago seems to have a valid reason to stay on as a Senator. According to her, until the ICC calls her to duty, the court will not be responsible for her income or professional accommodation. In other words, they will not pay her while she is on stand by. It would be a mistake if she resigns too soon since she doesn’t know when she is going to be called to report for duty. Furthermore, ICC president Sang-hyun Song also advised incoming judges “not to make any irreversible commitments for the time being which could terminate your current professional engagements with a view to future engagement at the Court.”

It could take years before Santiago is called in for duty. According to the ICC charter, “any incumbent judge shall not be allowed to retire until he finishes any trial in which he participated” and “a judge assigned to a Trial or Appeals Chamber continues in office in order to complete the trial or appeal, even after the expiry of his or her term.”

Most rational people would agree that the public will benefit more from Santiago than from some of the senatorial candidates — like Jack Enrile, for example. Filipinos should actually take advantage of her presence while she is still around. Jack’s father would, of course, disagree.

Senator Santiago should forget about the ICC and continue being a public servant of the Philippines instead. It would be a privilege to be a judge at the world stage but at this point, the country needs her. There is no other one like her. No one else can speak his or her mind the way she does. She does not engage in patronage politics the way most Filipino politicians do. Furthermore, the politics in the ICC can also be frustrating. The court is also limited by “a set of founding statutes that make it subservient to national powers”. Here’s an assessment of the court’s performance from the article The New Face of Global Justice:

…as a practical tool of justice, in the 10 years since the Rome Statute established it and in the seven years since it became operational, the ICC has disappointed. There are atrocities aplenty from Syria to Sudan, Colombia to North Korea. But the ICC has managed just one conviction—in March this year, of a lesser Congolese warlord, Thomas Lubanga, on charges of using child soldiers.

and

To an extent, the ICC’s attempts to extend international justice to the world were undermined from the start by a set of founding statutes that made it subservient to national powers. The ICC has not police of its own and has to rely on national forces to serve its indictments. The rules under which it operates mean it can only rarely be proactive; mostly it must be asked to intervene, either by the country in question or the U.N. Security Council. Even membership itself is voluntary.

It seems like being a judge of the ICC has its drawbacks after all. Even though it would be an honor for Senator Santiago to act as a judge of the ICC considering she is the first Filipino and first Asian from a developing country to sit in as one, I doubt if she will have as much fun as she has in the Philippines admonishing our incompetent public servants.

Ilda

In life, things are not always what they seem.

More Posts - Twitter

123 Comments

  • jaks says:

    “Most rational people would agree that the public will benefit more from Santiago than from some of the senatorial candidates ”

    i would have wanted to read more about why this is so. but there’s nothing. just the assumption that if youre rational so you should agree with ilda and if you dont, youre irrational. hahay.

  • Tommy blue says:

    JCC.. you dont know shit… stop acting like a bitch …little boy,and get your facts straight..LOL

  • Tommy blue says:

    @jaks..i would have wanted to read more about why this is so. but there’s nothing. just the assumption that if youre rational so you should agree with ilda and if you dont, youre irrational. hahay.—

    Well,if you get your head out of noynoys ass and stop acting like a drooling noytard,maybe..just maybe, you get to see whats right and wrong, or the good and badin that pathetic country…until then…you will be just a drooling noynoy psycophant..

    • Gogs says:

      Well,if you get your head out of noynoys ass and stop acting like a drooling noytard

      I doubt that’s possible. Being a paid troll for Noynoy Aquino is all jaks can do. Only explanation why jaks keeps comng back for more and quoting imaginary sources.

  • Isabel Juico says:

    JCC … do you just want to hear yourself talk like a true hepatic jaundiced cohorts of Aquino III… get your facts straight and get links or authenticated proof of what you say. We do not believe anything coming from your biased arguments. Are you turning green of jealousy from MDS and CJ corona’s accomplishments?? What about you are you an ACDC blogger?? Think before you talk or give us authenticated links not from the biased yellow media.

  • Isabel Juico says:

    JCC … do you just want to hear yourself talk like a true hepatic jaundiced cohorts of Aquino III… get your facts straight and get links or authenticated proof of what you say. We do not believe anything coming from your biased arguments. Are you turning green of jealousy from MDS and CJ corona’s accomplishments?? What about you are you an ACDC blogger?? Think before you talk or give
    us authenticated links not from the biased yellow media.

  • Isabel Juico says:

    there is really not much to read as jaks and Tommy Blue said.. except that MDS may have some ways in expressing herself but that is her… the point is that she is right, knowledgeable and an authority on the constitution as what she says.. She has every right to stay as senator until ICC calls her. JCC what is your proof that ICC changed their mind?? Your legality and points are useless and evitably filled with biased prejudicail statements… to talk just to talk.. You cannot debate MDS or any one of us with lies coming from your mouth. Give it a rest and face the mirror and start insulting yourself.

  • Isabel Juico says:

    JCC… i would take more time to argue with you.. but it is pointless arguing with a moronic person with unsubstantiated comments against MDS…

  • why she ? kung mayroong magresign yun ay ang chief of the Comelec from top to bottom…we love you Sen. meriam.

  • mario taporco says:

    Hello Ilda, not making any comment. Just like to say, you are raising some few eyebrows. Was that a comment, lol. Been out of the loop, but I’m here.

  • jcc says:

    i quoted amado doronilla, a pro CJ Corona about the participation of MDS in the impeachment of Erap in 2001 and he has unsavory entries in his book “The Fall of Joseph Estrada,” and what did i get in return?

    lots of ad-hominems.. hahay…

    • addhomomen says:

      Nope. Your feelings getting hurt because your arguments are demolished by logic and facts is not ad hominem.

    • Ilda says:

      @jcc

      Even if you quote the Queen of England, it won’t make a difference if it’s just baseless accusation.

      It is a fact that MDS was a part of the impeachment trial of Erap. What’s your point?!

    • MARY GRACE SANCHEZ says:

      JEJEMON CC…Amado Doronilla was always known to be the mouthpiece of Sen. Santiago’s arch-enemy…he should retire…as you should be disbarred if you truly are a lawyer together with LIEla Dilim-na.

  • jcc says:

    some people in this blog would like to be believed more than wikipedia and amado doronila, but they must flash their credential first if they want to create an impression that they have a better hold of the “facts” than the two sources i have mentioned. it has always been a source of eternal discomfort on my part seeing people online whose only claim to expertise is their fortune of having a keyboard to punch like agitated chimpanzees on steroid, and an internet connection to download their horseshits online.

    • addhomomen says:

      “chimpanzee”

      Now this is ad hominem.

      • jcc says:

        not your sole prerogative to dish out insult. i can trade one with yours with fanfare, but as ramboo said, i did not draw the first blood. :)

        • Ilda says:

          Oh please. You are the first to insult my articles most times. You can stop projecting the “holier than thou” image now.

    • Ilda says:

      @jcc

      Your law degree has not helped you come up with sound analysis, unfortunately.

      it has always been a source of eternal discomfort on my part seeing people online whose only claim to expertise is their fortune of having a keyboard to punch like agitated chimpanzees on steroid, and an internet connection to download their horseshits online

      I always think it’s a sign of victory when they move on to the ad hominem.” -Christopher Hitchens

  • jona-s says:

    I agree Miriam will have more fun in Pinas because this is where her fans are. In the ICC her antics and moments of lunacy will surely not be appreciated.

    • jeanne says:

      Perhaps, there are less idiots in the ICC.

      • Jona-s says:

        Yes, her fans are all in Pinas.

        • jeanne says:

          I think you read me wrong.

        • jona-s says:

          Nope, I’m sure I read you right. Unless, of course, you can tell me your point.

        • jeanne says:

          I guess the senator will have lesser problems in th ICC because they are less political and there no need to kiss bottoms. Nobody has to adhere to policing and popularity. It will be just a lengthy discussion about laws, criminals and other law-related things. Then again, even an ideal environment can get boring for a while. I don’t know how she will fit in the ICC but I think she knows Philippine politics (and circus) for a long time. I’m sure she will have her fair share of friends, enemies and frenemies.

    • MARY GRACE SANCHEZ says:

      stupid comment…you denigrate not only Miriam but the state parties who voted her number one overwhelmingly to be a member of the ICC… only in the Philippines do we have morons who can’t live without being a crab!

      • Jona-s says:

        Well, I’m sorry but Miriam, for me is demented. That is how I see her and I’m really sorry if I upset you. She’s the political version of Annabelle Rama.

        So what if she was voted no. 1? Was that proof that she’s not insane? Maecos was no. 1 too. So was Hitler, Saddam and Khadaff.

        Again, I’m sorry for what I said about Miriam.

      • Jona-s says:

        I ‘judge’ Miriam, yes, and say sorry to you not her because you idolized her. She’s demented ma’m, not you.

        • MARY GRACE SANCHEZ says:

          I idolize her in present form…and you sir are abusing your mind…show me a psychiatric evaluation of your claims…otherwise, shut up cuz you are just proving yourself to be the sira-ulo that you are.

        • jona-s says:

          Mary Grace, calm down. Your nerves is getting out of whack hence you’re almost not making sense.

          Why will I show you a psychiatric evaluation of my opinion about Miriam? Does Miriam ask for it every time she calls people beneath her sira-ulo like her?

          And don’t be so confrontational. Hot-headedness will get you nowhere. I did nothing to make you mad. I said nothing insulting to you. I even said sorry for not agreeing with you. I just expressed my opinion about the subject of this thread. If you do not agree with it, say so and SHOW ME your contrary opinion.

          Let us not get personal, let us stay on topic. Peace.

        • jona-s says:

          “I idolize her in present form…” – MARY GRACE SANCHEZ
          ——

          You can even idolize her in a demented form and my opinion of her remains. I’m sorry, blusters and swagger do not impress me. Arrogance and bombastic speeches do not intimidate me. And I’m not one to adore and worship someone who is so full of herself.

          Nope. Not me.

  • Der Fuhrer says:

    @Jona-s

    Ingit ka lang kay Miriam Defensor Santiago. She has a beautiful, brilliant mind. Your crab mentality and little mind shows.

    • Jona-s says:

      Miriam brilliant mind? For you she got a brilliant mind? Really? Ummm….

      • scarletpro says:

        geezzz you cant explain why you hate her…

        • jona-s says:

          Again, another request for an explanation, lol!

          If you do not agree with what I’m saying, you are very welcome to contradict it.

          Don’t start a conversation by asking a question because it just exposes your position to the issue. Weak.

        • Jona-s says:

          Please domo I’m so scared of you don’t scare me more, please! I’m not going to engage you with your game because I’m too scared of you. And your game is too immature too, lol!

          Now let’s go back to the issue.

  • jona-s says:

    “Senator Santiago should forget about the ICC and continue being a public servant of the Philippines instead. ” – Ilda
    —–

    I agree. What will she do there anyway? Start to make a name for herself again? With her age and diminishing return intellectually, I don’t think she’ll accomplish much there.

    What she should do really is become not just a public servant. All her professional life she has been just that. Why not be a “real” public servant this time? You know, the one that really deals with the people directly. Be the executive herself. In that position she will not only get to use her mouth and her heavily-used brain but be a hands-on leader too.

    We all know that her attempt to become the chief executive, the highest public servant in the land was thwarted when she ran against Fidel Ramos. After that, she has practically reduced herself to a sideline heckler. A highest paid usisera. Cheering for losers like Erap and Gloria. She don’t need all that. She don’t have to be that.

    In all the years she served in the court, and all those years being a senator has really not proven Miriam’s worth as a real public servant. Everybody knows how she can browbeat any ordinary mortals who comes to her court or in any court she occupies. She even impressed a lot of people how brilliant she is and how legally sound her thinking was. She excelled, so to speak, in being a magistrate all her life. But people forget that that is not what a public servant is.

    I say, run for mayor, governor or even president again if she really wants to serve and to solidify her image as a brilliant government servant. As a former judge and a seasoned legislator, there is really nothing left for her to prove.

    It’s time to up the ante, if she’s really interested in improving the lot of the country, than by just making blusters and bombastic speeches meant for consumption of the gullible public. That is so ’80s.

    • MARY GRACE SANCHEZ says:

      and who are you to map out her public life?? since you know so much about being a public servant, why don’t you run yourself? wonder how many votes you’ll get…and Wonder no more..Miriam will make a name for herself in the ICC & the Philippines will be in the global map again!!! And before you give your unsolicited advice to Miriam, correct your grammar first…”She don’t need all that. She don’t have to be that.”…LOL!!!!

      • jona-s says:

        Before you asked me that question, better ask the author of this thread because she was the first to ‘map out’ Miriam’s public life. I’m just agreeing with her.

        You want me to run? Shoot. On one condition, I will run against Miriam. Deal?

        Miriam will make a name for herself in the ICC? Again? And what will the Filipinos get out from it? Susme! Mabubusog ba ang mga mahihirap if ever Miriam makes a name in the ICC? Susmarya!

        Yes, I thank you for correcting my grammar. I hope you will not charge me for it. Anyway, it’s a good thing that you found time to notice my grammar that you were unable to make a sense out of your response. I’m sorry if my grammar confused you to the point of making you incapable of responding with reason and tact.

        Peace.

        • jeanne says:

          Perhaps it is a matter of national pride – pride that a Filipino can sit in an international court. It could be anybody but it turns out that it is Miriam. I think she qualifies and –if your reasons are personal against her appointment and qualifications, you’re free to express them. But don’t blame others who can appreciate her (sometimes) and her contributions to the public.

        • jona-s says:

          I agree on the so-called national pride if Miriam gets to sit in an international court. And there is no question as to her qualification. It just so happened that I agree with the author that in remaining in the country to serve as a public servant, the Filipino people will directly benefit more in Miriam than be just a symbol of pride outside. That is what should the pro-Miriam should wish for.

          For me, I have no personal agenda against Miriam. What will I get going against somebody whose admirers are as crazy as her? Just like everybody else who dislike her, I just don’t agree with her irresponsible and disrespectful actuations in public. I don’t like the way she treats people, especially those she considers beneath her. I abhor the way she represents the institution she belongs to with arrogance and misplaced pride. I’m disgusted how she project herself thumbing her nose to ordinary mortals because she, unlike them, is a brilliant luminary and a legal scholar.

          Don’t get me wrong, Miriam is a gentle soul and a calm presence in person, at least from a distance. I’ve seen her a number of times in the Senate and she is a picture of confident composure and cheerful disposition. I just don’t know where her mean and vicious front comes from every time a microphone is put in front of her.

  • jeanne says:

    @jona-s thanks for replying. That clears up many things for me and other posters as well. I guess we can only guess because she is definitely a unique person on her own. I don’t think we can really see or understand a person, even a public person. At least, you get to meet her and have your own opinions about her.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

64 queries in 1.015 seconds.