Kicking a horse when it is down. It’s an idiom for what a person does to his opponent. The Urban Dictionary describes it as when someone breaks up with their girl/boyfriend and continues to bitch about them with their friends weeks later. It’s the same as when someone beats his opponent to a pulp even when the latter had already been trampled to the bone. That was exactly what the prosecution team was doing to Chief Justice Renato Corona during their press conference after the closing arguments of the impeachment trial. It could also be said that this is what most Filipinos want to see them do because the prosecution is comprised of members of the House of Representatives – public servants who represent the Filipino people.

It seems the prosecution were not satisfied with all the violations they committed against Corona’s right to due process and his right to privacy before and during the course of the entire trial so much so that they just had to continue badmouthing him outside the courtroom. It’s as if the prosecution wanted to satisfy the bloodthirsty watching crowd who couldn’t get enough of the gory stuff inside the arena so they had to bring the fight outside.
The prosecution’s behaviour in the press conference proved that they wanted to destroy what little dignity Corona had after his humbling experience during his testimony. In their attempts to demonize Corona though, the prosecution team only proved that they were foul-mouthed, ungentlemanly and unsportsmanlike, indeed. Leading the charge was Congressman Rodolfo Fariñas who acted like the leader of a pack of wolves. He got high-fives from his supporters who thought he was “the man” for his use of the word “palusot” in describing Corona’s testimonies.
The prosecution were feeling proud of themselves and didn’t bother hiding the feeling of pleasure derived from the misfortunes that they have bestowed on Corona. A lack of quiet magnanimity spells an indictment of their character. The braggarts and show-offs were too full of themselves and totally oblivious of the fact that contrary to what they think, those who enjoy someone else’s misfortune actually have very low self-esteem. As pointed out before, according to a recent study by scientists in Leiden University, the Netherlands, “when you have low self-esteem, you will do almost anything to feel better, and when you’re confronted with the misfortune of others, you’ll feel schandenfreude.”
The English word for schandenfreude is gloating and it means “to observe or think about something with triumphant and often malicious satisfaction, gratification, or delight”.
One can be forgiven for thinking that the rest of the prosecution team must have low self-esteem because it seems like they feel a strong sense of schandenfreude or pleasure at seeing Corona and his family suffer.
I can understand why prosecution members are boasting about getting the result they wanted. From Day One of the trial they have been outclassed by the defense team and been berated by some of the more rational Senator Judges for their incompetence and defiance of the court rules in the last five months. It is quite unfortunate that the majority of the Senators apply excessive “liberality” to regarding the prosecution’s violations even when the proceedings have become a joke.
The defense team and Corona’s mistake was in trusting that the prosecution and the impeachment court would eventually realise that they had to do the right thing and grant Corona due process. The defense didn’t realise that they were dealing with a bunch of lawbreakers not lawmakers. For the prosecutors never planned on upholding the law from the very beginning. They had a single purpose and that was to get rid of Corona by all means even to the extent of betraying the Constitution.
In retrospect, it seems that the prosecution just wanted to humiliate Corona in front of the public when they compelled him to testify against himself. Once at the witness stand however, the prosecution wasn’t even interested in clarifying any of the allegations they forwarded to the court. They didn’t want to give Corona an opportunity to clear his name because they wanted the public to continue thinking that he stole money. It was too late when defense lawyer Dennis Manalo finally highlighted this during his closing arguments. It was futile to ask the prosecution to explain why they didn’t ask Corona all the questions they needed to ask while he was on the witness stand. By then, the public couldn’t have cared less about what Corona had to say anyway. They already wanted to crucify him.
If anyone ever thought that the Philippines is already run like hell, they haven’t seen the consequence of all the branches of government bowing down to the executive branch yet. Yes, the mighty members of Congress are patting themselves on the back for a job well done and thinking about putting their feet up now that the destruction of our institutions’ system of checks and balances is complete. They just want to land one last punch on Corona’s face before going back to their “House”.






This impeachment, well, according to a legal luminary -
***************************************************
“There should be no debate that impeachment is a recognized constitutional process to uphold public accountability and sanction the excesses of high government officials like the President, Vice President, Justices of the Supreme Court, Members of the Constitutional Commissions and the Ombudsman.
IT IS ALSO SETTLED THAT MORE THAN A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING, IMPEACHMENT IS A POLITICAL EXERCISE…
…NONETHELESS, THE RULE OF LAW, NOT THE IMPORTUNING OF THE MOB OR THE OBSESSION OF ONE MAN, must be ascendant in all the phases of the impeachment process. It is a political undertaking circumscribed by due process and the tenets of fair play. (See any similarity?)
Consequently, the Senate as the impeachment court should have conducted a preliminary hearing to determine whether the “verification” of 188 complainants was compliant as a component of due process OR WAS A SHAMELESS SHAM BECAUSE IT WAS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR 188 REPRESENTATIVES TO HAVE INDIVIDUALLY AND PERSONALLY “READ AND UNDERSTOOD” IN A COUPLE OF HOURS THE 57-PAGE COMPLAINT AS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTITUTION AND THE HOUSE RULES ON IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS. A VALID VERIFICATION IS A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO IMPEACHMENT AND TRIAL. THE PURPORTED VERIFICATION OF 1/3 OF THE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE WAS THE SPEED VEHICLE WHICH CONVEYED WITH ALACRITY THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT TO THE SENATE. PERFORCE, A PRELIMINARY HEARING ON THE ALLEGED FATAL VERIFICATION WAS IN ORDER. (See the familiarity?)
The Senate should have motu proprio prohibited and sanctioned print media for publishing self-serving full-page paid advertisements which tend to influence Senator-Judges and calculated to sway public opinion (take note yellow suckers, JCC to be specific) on which some Senator-Judges announced they would base their decision.”
MORE THAN A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING, IMPEACHMENT IS A POLITICAL EXERCISE.”
***************************************************
IN SHORT, POLITICAL PATRONAGE RATHER THAN JUSTICE.
Well the yellow suckers can gloat about the decision. They can also gloat about the next in line Supreme Court Justices who are all GMA appointees as Tupaz has promised after Corona.
According to the yellow suckers, they don’t have to fear anything, even the impeachment, if they don’t have anything to hide.
Question – if suddenly, those SC Justices voluntarily waive their bank deposit secrecy right as a preemptive action (without waiting for impeachment case), provided Tupaz et al do the same,would Tupaz et al also voluntarily do it for the sake of transparency? Tupaz et al should have nothing to fear, isn’t it?
IMO, nah. Tupaz will say, for Corona, he was the one being impeached, and for these SC Justices, they’re the ones being investigated. He will declare they will finish these first and then our waiver. The scenario I’m seeing.
Thinking aloud, if Corona has this lots of undeclared bank deposits and they’re ill-gotten, I could surmised it’s not from jueteng or illegal drugs or kidnaping for ransom crimes.
Probably, it’s something that has to do with his job as a private lawyer, then a judge, then a supreme court chief justice.
Question – Why was nobody volunteer to be a a direct or indirect witness for these “corruptions” related to him being the chief justice or as a private lawyer?
I’m sure they will be right away covered by all sorts of legal protection for being a voluntary witness.
From this one, doubting commenters here can postulate their own.
The behaviours of the prosecution team, can work against them…filipino will remenber them, when election will come…It can work against Noynoy Aquino and his party…remember there is an end to everything…
Ang sabi ni CJ:
1. Wala akong dollar account. Yung pala meron. Siya ang nagamin.
2. Noong tinanong siya ni JPE kung matagal pa yung kanyang opening statement, sabi nya sandali na lang. Ayon inabot ng 2.5 hours yung sandali nya.
3. Sabi nya sa opening statement nya, wala kaming hilig sa mamahaling bagay. Kaya pala sya may Bellagio, The Columns and iba pa.
4. Sabi nya wala syang alam sa “asset-debit”, pero Master degree holder ng Ateneo at Harvard at nakapagtrabaho pa sa banko at SGV.
5. Sabi nya nagpagamit daw si Ombudsman sa gobyerno. Sino ba ang nagpatawag sa Ombudsman para tumistigo?
6. Noong umaga bago siya unang tumistigo, sabi nya wala syang kakaba-kaba. Pero ang pasulot nya noong nagpakita sa uli ay hindi sya nakatulog, hindi kumain at kinakabahan.
7. Sabi nya hindi sya nakikialam sa sigalot ng BGEI. Pero ang sabi ng testigo nila na si Atienza, ilan beses nya nakausap si Corona.
At marami pang iba.
Ano ang tawag sa taong ganito?
3.1 Ayon sa liquidation nya ng allowances, preferred ni Corona at asawa nya ang more than Php24,000.00 peso single meal atsaka ang binili nyang gifts nung xmas nasa Php 100,000.00. Simpleng buhay daw yun.
8. Sabi nya wala syang inapi, pero may tinutukan sya ng baril at mayroon pa itong affidavit na sinulat ng biktima nuong nabubuhay pa.
9. Sabi nya wala raw silang katulong, pero pinapalaba nila mga damit nila. Ano yun? hindi ba katulong yun?
10. Sabi nya kay Morales, mag-resign daw. Sya, kahit katakut takot na ang mga isyu laban sa kanya (bukod pa kasinungalingan nya), nakadikit pa rin sa pwesto hanggang sa huli.
At marami pang iba.
In the final analysis… It is the Filipino people who are the losers. Will legitimate public dissent rise after the dust of the political farce has settled? Will the silent majority strike back in the coming elections? Only God knows.